CGSpaceA Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs
    View Item 
    •   CGSpace Home
    • CGIAR 2030 research initiatives (2022-2024)
    • CGIAR Initiative on Digital Innovation
    • View Item
       
    • CGSpace Home
    • CGIAR 2030 research initiatives (2022-2024)
    • CGIAR Initiative on Digital Innovation
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Exploring the potential of customized AI chatbots in food policy research: Capabilities and constraints in comparative perspective

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Exploring the Potential of Customized AI Chatbots in Food Policy Research: Capabilities and Constraints in Comparative Perspective (Working Paper) (1.311Mb)
    Authors
    Benson, Todd
    Date Issued
    2023-12
    Date Online
    2024-01
    Language
    en
    Type
    Working Paper
    Review status
    Internal Review
    Accessibility
    Open Access
    Usage rights
    CC-BY-4.0
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Share
    
    Citation
    Benson, Todd. 2023. Exploring the potential of customized AI chatbots in food policy research: Capabilities and constraints in comparative perspective. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    Permanent link to cite or share this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/137261
    Abstract/Description
    Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools are rapidly transforming the way people work, providing opportunities for improving efficiency, accelerating innovations, and supporting human decision making. The area of policymaking is no exception. To explore the advantages and disadvantages of customized chatbots for supporting food policy research, we created a virtual food policy expert using a customized AI system using training literature drawn from about two dozen food policy research reports or food policy documents. A range of questions seeking food policy advice were then posed to the chatbot to better understand the limits to its expertise, the accuracy of its responses, and the value it might offer users seeking specific advice to guide the formulation and implementation of food policy related strategies and programs. A relatively simple comparative assessment was made of the results obtained from asking the same food policy-related questions to different AI sources, including the customized AI virtual food policy expert. Overall, we found that AI -based chatbots can be useful tools for summarizing research and providing “first cut” information only. We also conclude that, while customized chatbots have the advantage of offering the possibility of uploading pre-selected papers, unless a large amount of information is uploaded or the chatbot is also allowed by design to draw on information from other sources including the internet, the responses the virtual coach provides may be limited to only a small and specific set of questions. To be more credible and useful for policymakers, chatbots need to be enabled to provide more specific information. For the foreseeable future, providing such detailed and often country-specific information will still be in the hands of human experts.
    CGIAR Action Areas
    Systems Transformation
    CGIAR Impact Areas
    Climate adaptation and mitigation; Nutrition, health and food security; Poverty reduction, livelihoods and jobs
    CGIAR Initiatives
    Digital Innovation; National Policies and Strategies
    AGROVOC Keywords
    artificial intelligence; policy innovation; innovation; technology adoption; research
    Collections
    • CGIAR Initiative on Digital Innovation [138]

    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback
     

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Browse

    All of CGSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subjectThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subject

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback